"We Penetrate the Cabinets"               
The Fourth Industrial Revolution & the Digitization of Humanity 
Professionals Speak Out 
The emergence of SARS Corona virus 2 that resulted in the covid-19 pandemic was most likely the result of a research related incident. Most likely. I have looked at the evidence quite a lot today and I must say the evidence is pretty strong.
An Analysis of the Origins of the COVID-19
U.S. Committee on Intelligence summary of the second interim report on the 
Some of the most senior scientist's in the UK back in early 2020 when they were writing and supporting scientific papers saying there was absolutely no possibility that the virus could have arisen in a lab. That S.A.R.S. Corona 2 was definitely a natural spill over and they were quite clear about that but actually it turns out that their was a lot of counter arguments at the time but they were aware of that but of course we weren't told we were told absolutely transparently that this was a natural spill over event in definitive scientific papers. I feel let down by the pear review literature which was always taken as absolute gospel but it turns out that may be less than the case. Lets look at what we know about this because we always want to be evidence based.
Getting from the scientific literature and it now turns out it was not quite as analytical as we would like it to be. Now this is related to viral origin. The point is if the literature is open to debate now in retrospect about the viral origins what else is going to open to further debate? What else did we talk about that might be less than accurate? Basically I would like to apologize for getting it wrong in the early stages of the pandemic. In light of future evidence because in the early stages of the pandemic I remember reporting these papers saying it was a natural spill over event whereas now there is significant doubt. In my view now the balance of probability is pretty overwhelming.
What is new in the journals story? The journal has reported that the energy department has received additional information that point to the lab leak theory what specifically it is was not disclosed but we do know that there is something that 3 years into the pandemic there was a new piece of information that changed the perspective of the energy department in terms of what they believe what cause Covid -19 to emerge. We do know that other government agencies are not onboard in the US. There are competing theories even among US intelligence agencies. The fact that there is new information coming 3 years in is pretty significant at this point. The U.S. and the World Health Organization and others are still trying to dig into this, trying to get additional information to find out what could have happened.
I'll add one provocative statement. It may shock you or not shock you. I chaired a commission for the lancet for 2 years on covid I am pretty convinced it came out of a U.S. lab bio technology not out of nature. Just to mention that after 2 years of intensive work on this so it is a blunder in my view of biotech not an accident of a natural spillover. We don't know for sure to be absolutely clear, but there is enough evidence that it should be looked into and it is not being investigated. Not in the united states not anywhere and I think for real reasons they do not want to look underneath the rug to much. Well that got us into a tremendous mess.
One of the things that tips us off that they may have been trying was in 2018 they asked for money  from D.A.R.P.A. and in that money they wanted to insert the furin cleavage site which makes it highly infectious in humans so if they had the idea of that and they are asking for money then they must have thought wow we can do this. Even our government at finally that point decided to not to fund that, what they are asking for. This is why I am thinking there was a holy cow moment when all of a sudden these scientists see the sequence of covid -19 and they are going oh my goodness didn't they ask us in 2018 to put that furin cleavage site in? And low and behold it is there? If there is some compelling evidence that suggests it could have come from a lab could you give me 2 or 3 things that this virus has that makes you think its lab verses.
Some of the evidence for MERS and SARS that it came from animals. Yes there are 3 regions. The receptor binding domain, furin cleavage site and the=is protein 8 from the left called ORF 8. With respect to the receptor binding domain if you look at what happened with SARS 1 we had the virus sequence binding domain that first was in civic cats in the markets jumped into a few humans we have the virus sequence then and it started infecting more and then we had the virus sequence when it became human to human passage could occur and then a pandemic occurred so you see the progression of mutations as the virus adapted from being in civic cats and then being in humans. The first jump to the humans it had only 50% of the mutations needed to support an epidemic. Lets flip to SARS covid 2.

When you look at the virus that first entered the human population out of all of the changes in the receptor binding domain there are 200 possible changes, 200 amino acids, 4000 possible changes. There were only 17 mutations that could make it a better virus. Its receptor binding optimization was 99.5% and in fact one of the 17 ended up being the delta variant.So that kind of optimization jux ta posed by the fact that there were no patients in Wuhan, 36000 blood back specimens tested for antibodies in 2019 not a single patient was infected lets go back to SARS 1, 20% of all people in the markets were infected while the virus was practicing to set up an epidemic. 1% of the general population so we would have expected up to 360 in the general population in Wuhan we "ZERO".
Let me speak of this corona virus and how you have had the truth kept from you. More than three million people now around the world have died so far from this corona virus. The lives of billions of people has been totally disrupted. And the extraordinary thing is that we still do not know how this virus started or let me be more accurate. We are still not told how this virus started.Was it a natural out break? And there is know one to blame or did it in fact escape from a Chinese laboratory? And we do have someone to blame. There is a new article in the Bulletin of atomic scientists which says too many people want to keep from you, the truth. The fact that the evidence now strongly suggests that the virus was created by Chinese scientists who then let it escape as the article makes clear top virologists don't want you too.
Know this because this is in fact this is the kind of lethal research that they have been working on as well to make viruses more lethal. Some top American bureaucrats don't want you to know either because they were actually funding this virus work at Chinas institute of virology in Wuhan exactly where this pandemic started. What are the odds? Obviously China does not want you to know because then the world hold China to account and demand compensation and of course there were all the trump hating journalists who did not want you to even think that US President Donald Trump was actually right when he said this virus did escape from the Wuhan institute of virology, nonsense said ABC...........
This equation has 4 factors. You have a thing on the left CO2 that we want to get to "ZERO" and that is going to be based on the number of people the services each person is using on average, the energy used on average and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy. So lets look at each one of these and see how we can get this down to zero. Probably one of these numbers has to get pretty near to "ZERO" first we have population now the world today has 6.8 billion people NOW IF WE DO A REALLY GREAT JOB ON NEW VACCINES, HEALTH CARE, REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%.