"We Penetrate the Cabinets"
The Fourth Industrial Revolution & the Digitization of Humanity
Online Definition of Vaccine Bait and Switch
The American Legal Status of the Center for Control and Prevention is registered as something know as a Public Private Partnership. Meaning that this Corporation is privately owned. Being such the CDC is in business to generate Income just like any other business for profit. It makes one wonder how something as important as medicine is to the public, how can this P.P.P. designation of being privately owned and operates to make profit not be a conflictive interest? In the eyes of the public who depend on the quality of the medicine to perform at an uninhibited level of performance .
Why don't we blow the system up? I mean obviously we just can't turn off the spigot on the system we have and then say everyone in the world should get this new vaccine that we have not given to anyone yet. But there must be some way.
In order to make the transition from getting out of the tried and true egg growing which we know that can give us results that can be, you know, beneficial. We have done well with that to something that has to be much better you have to prove that this works. Then you got to go through all the clinical trials and then show that this particular product is going to be good over a period of years. That alone if it works perfectly is going to take a decade.
Email from CDC states, “The definition of Vaccine we have Posted is Problematic”
Now it is known that Mr. Fauci has know literally for decades that immunity is the best result for a vaccine and human health. So one has to wonder why would Mr. Fauci create a product that would not create immunity but rather to "stimulate the bodies immune response against diseases". That would most certainly turn the vaccine into a future product line. Additionally It would match up with head advisor of the World Economic Forum, Yuval Harrai's and the Loyal Canadian Constituent's' memberships vision of Building Minds Bodies & Brains as the Economic Engine of the Global Economy in the 21st century.
Vaccine Definition
The definition of Vaccine prior to May 16, 2018, states that “Vaccine: a product that stimulates a person's immune system to produce immunity”. The new vaccine definition reads “Vaccine: a preparation that is used to stimulate the body's immune response against diseases” so I think it is reasonable to assume that the new vaccine does not produce immunity from its use. So let me ask you. Which would you select if you had a choice between taking a vaccine that produces immunity meaning that even if you are exposed to the disease you will not contract because the product produces immunity. Or one that “is used to stimulate the bodies immune response against diseases” The new preparation that used to be a product does not state that it produces immunity, it says it stimulates the bodies immune response. So if you wanted to be cured and had a choice based on what the product is said to do, which would you take? I would take the one that produces immunity. However, if you really understood the preparation was a product, and you wanted to keep selling vaccines you would want a preparation that was not stated to produce immunity over the product that produces immunity?
Vaccination Definition
The definition prior to May 16, 2018 states as: "The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease". The updated definition of the definition of the word "vaccination" reads: " The act of "introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease".
