"We Penetrate the Cabinets"
The Fourth Industrial Revolution & the Digitization of Humanity
Origin Supplement 3
March 16 2018 U.S, Governments defense, advanced research projects agency commonly known as D.A.R.P.A. Announces a bold initiative to develop next generation non surgical neural technology. It is designed to allow the human brain to directly interface with machines. We know that the D.A.R.P.A. is exploring human machine interfaces that include direct connections between the brain and outside systems. That's been from the beginning of Darpa's information Technology mission. Darpa has created things that we take for granted everyday, including the technology that became the internet. A new technology which is very much on the verge of being a reality that is being fielded is we could have a sensor maybe on the surface of our head or maybe implanted some where in our body in our brain that allows us.
To interact directly with our communications gear, our prepossessing gear, our weapons systems and so on. Now imagine we take this technology and control robots at a distance with it. Even fly drones. You put this sensor on and if you think the right way and you can increase the speed of the fan by thinking and controlling that thought with direct to mind or direct to machine interfacing. D.A.R.P,A. funded researchers have spent decades investigating how the human mind can be altered. In 1965 D.A.R.P.A. launched project Pandora which studied the possibility of using micro wave radiation to control human behavior. There are explicit programs of D.A.R.P.A. to read and write to human brains whether it is through direct implants within the brain or wearing some kind of cap. So what is the next step? Maybe the next step is we can send introductions and information to an actual person from a distance with this type of technology to let another person control their actions but that could be something that could be malicious. If there is some way to do it from a distance, a much greater distance than something you can ware on your scalp that would be the ultimate technological achievement that would fall under this realm of mind control and direct human to machine interface.
Project Veritas has obtain never before seen military documents regarding the origins of covid 19, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed and the governments efforts to conceal all of this. Dr. Anthony Fauci has testified many times before congress that the US government was never involved in gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of technology they gained in lethality it is a new virus that's not gain of function? According to the definition of gain of function currently operable. That assertion is based on the NIH's definition of gain of function. However the documents we obtained refute that. The documents in question stems from a report that the defense advanced research projects agency better know as D.A.R.P.A. which were hidden in a top secret share drive but what is D.A.R.P.A.?
D.A.R.P,A, is a department of U.S. defense which facilitates research and technology with potential military applications. Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the inspector general of the department of defense written by US marine core major Joseph Murphy a former D.A.R.P.A. fellow. Major Murphy makes claims in his report to the inspector general that if true could be damming to the official narrative that has been played out to the world during the past 2 years. Major Murphy's report states that Eco Health Alliance approach D.A.R.P.A. in March 2018 seeking funding for Gain of Function Research of bat born corona viruses. D.A.R.P.A. rejected the proposal cause the work was too dangerous and could violate the gain of function moratorium despite Eco Health's position that it would not. According to the documents the N.I.A.I.D. under the direction of Dr. Fauci did not reject the proposal. They went ahead with the research at Wuhan and at several sites across the US. So here is the question. If the Department of Defense the same people that make our nuclear arsenal felt this research was too dangerous to proceed with, why in the world did the NIH, NIAID and the Eco Health recklessly disregard the risks involved?
A new study claims Chinese scientists created covid 19 in the Wuhan lab. In a bid to cover their tracks they tried reverse engineering versions of the virus to make it look like it evolved naturally from bats. A research paper written by professor Angus & a Norwegian scientist Dr. Sorensen claims that they have had premafacia evidence of retro engineering in China for a year. However all of their findings were ignored by academics and major journals. Other allegations in the study include accusations of deliberate destruction, concealment or containment of data at Chinese labs. Researchers also found unique finger prints in covid 19 samples that according to the researchers might have arisen from manipulation in the laboratory. It also notes the disappearance of scientists in the communist country especially those who spoke out.
You know the vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer. They were developed by the N.I.H. the patents are owned 50% by NIH. Nor were they manufactured by Pfizer or Moderna they were manufactured by Military contractors and basically Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamp on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry but you know that's not what they were doing. This was a military project from the beginning.
In early to mid January I did have multiple calls with Fauci, Farrar and Tetros about how important I thought it was that science get engaged in aggressive pursuit of both hypothesis. I also expressed as a clinical virologist that I felt it was not scientifically plausible that this virus went from a bat to humans and became one of the most infectious viruses we have for humans. Science has debate and they squashed any debate. Given what we know now and looking at all the conversations in February 2020 and before release of the paper do you think that Dr.Fauci used this paper to hide the gain of function research created this virus? Do you think that the paper hides the truth? I think it is an inaccurate paper that basically was part of a narrative that they were creating. Remember this pandemic did not start at a seafood market.
It's really quite outrageous that this was treated as a conspiracy theory when it is a perfectly legitimate scientific consideration. Senator Peters stresses that this is a scientific analysis on the origin of the virus with public health and home land security issues not just in the united states this is a vital matter for everywhere. Lets take a look at what Mr Fauci's inner circle said privately about the origins of the virus discussions that were only reveal through litigation. Christian Andersen wrote the lab escape version of this is so frigging likely to have happened because they were already doing this type of work and the molecular data is fully consistent with that scenario. Ian Lipkin stressed the nightmare of circumstantial evidence to access regarding the possibility of inadvertently release given the scale of bat corona virus pursued in Wuhan.